home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Amiga Plus 1995 #5 & #6
/
Amiga Plus CD - 1995 - No. 5 and 6.iso
/
pd
/
grafik
/
lightwave
/
lightwave-mar95
/
000254_owner-lightwave-l _Fri Mar 10 21:56:34 1995.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-04-09
|
1KB
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave-l>
Received: by netcom10.netcom.com (8.6.10/Netcom)
id VAA22936; Fri, 10 Mar 1995 21:26:42 -0800
Received: from mailhost.ecn.uoknor.edu by mail4.netcom.com (8.6.10/Netcom)
id SAA19066; Thu, 9 Mar 1995 18:29:56 -0800
Received: by mailhost.ecn.uoknor.edu (Smail3.1.28.1 #20)
id m0rmuMo-000DL4C; Thu, 9 Mar 95 20:23 CST
Received: by oubbs.telecom.uoknor.edu
id 0SM7H00Y Thu, 09 Mar 95 20:22:13
From: alan.chan@oubbs.telecom.uoknor.edu
Message-ID: <9503092022.0SM7H00@oubbs.telecom.uoknor.edu>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 95 20:22:13
Subject: SUGGESTION FO
To: lightwave-l@netcom.com
Sender: owner-lightwave-l@netcom.com
Precedence: bulk
> I don't want to come off as "Internet Police" (I've been flamed
> for
> that before), BUT come on guys(/gals)...couldn't you be a bit
> more
> creative with your subject lines? "PAR" tells me little if
> anything
> of what is to come! Looking at the intended question below, I
> might
> come up with "PAR -> Removable media -> BetaSP/D2" as a
> subject.
>
> I'm all for SAVING BANDWIDTH, but NOT in the subject line.
> Please?
My subject line for your post was "SUGGESTION FO". Hmm... Are you saying we
should try rewriting your line too? =)
AC